Burned battery: This lithium-ion battery from a 787 Dreamliner caught fire in a plane traveling from Tokyo to Boston last week.
A fire last week and a forced landing today have brought the possibility of such problems to the forefront.
Kevin Bulls, M.I.T. Technology Review, Energy News, January 16, 2013
"Two major safety incidents involving Boeing 787 Dreamliners have
caused two Japanese airlines to ground their fleets of the aircraft. The
problems may be linked to a battery chemistry that’s particularly prone
to causing fires.
Earlier today, a plane in Japan was forced to make an emergency
landing after reports of a battery warning light and burning smell. Last
week, a battery caught fire on a plane on the ground in Boston. In both
cases, the problems may be related to Boeing’s decision to use a kind
of lithium-ion battery chemistry that overheats and catches fire more
readily than others.
It’s not yet clear whether the problems in the 787s originated with
the batteries. Faults in the electronic controls have been implicated in
other lithium-ion battery fires. According to reports,
inspectors found liquid leaking from the 787’s batteries after the
forced landing in Japan today. The battery was also discolored, but it
wasn’t clear if it had caught fire.
Lithium-ion batteries have been known to cause fires in cell phones, laptops, and electric vehicles. But such problems are extremely rare, and
usually result from damage to the battery—such as piercing or
overcharging—or problems with the manufacturing process that introduce
flaws in the cells.
Boeing’s 787 is the first commercial aircraft to use lithium-ion
batteries, according to GS Yuasa, the Japanese battery manufacturer that
supplies the batteries. The company also supplies batteries for the
International Space Station and electric railcars, among other
applications.
The chemistry—and safety—of lithium-ion batteries varies. According
to GS Yuasa’s website, the batteries it uses for Boeing’s 787 use
lithium cobalt oxide electrodes. These are known for high-energy storage
capacity, but other battery chemistries, such as lithium iron
phosphate, are more resistant to overheating. Because of safety
concerns, many electric vehicle makers have shifted to alternative
chemistries, sacrificing some energy storage capacity.
Because the electrolyte materials used are flammable,
no lithium-ion batteries are completely safe. Some companies are
developing a version that doesn’t use these electrolytes (see “Solid-State Batteries”).
Consequently, battery makers install various safety features, including
electronics designed to prevent overcharging. They also often include
sensors and cooling systems.
According
to GS Yuasa, its battery for the 787 “comes with battery management
electronics which guarantees multiple levels of safety features.” A specification sheet
for the batteries warns, “Inappropriate handling or application of the
cells can result in reduced cell life and performance, electrolyte
leakage, high cell temperatures, and even the possibility of smoke
generation and fire.”
Boeing declined to comment on its selection of battery chemistries. A
spokesperson says it is aware of the incident in Japan and is working
with the airline and regulatory bodies to address it."
OUR TENTH-YEAR! Come celebrate all of the ham-fisted, ill-equipped, unprepared and totally inebriated photographers around the globe whom attempted to get that perfect aircraft photo but "Jacked It Up." We aim to provide the finest “Best of The Rest” photos, 'cause we don't use no stinkin' screeners. You send it, we post it. Click on photos to see them full size, and submissions are most welcome (if you dare). Remember, "Don't delete. Just submit your pics and repeat."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment